<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Center For Small Government &#187; Small Government Proposals for Taxes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.centerforsmallgovernment.com/category/small-government-proposals/taxes-small-government-proposals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.centerforsmallgovernment.com</link>
	<description>Small Government Solutions to Big Government Problems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 06:05:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Congress should tell Special Interests: You get just one lollipop</title>
		<link>http://www.centerforsmallgovernment.com/feature/congress-should-tell-special-interests-you-get-just-one-lollipop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.centerforsmallgovernment.com/feature/congress-should-tell-special-interests-you-get-just-one-lollipop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 18:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carla Howell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Small Government Proposals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Government Proposals for Government Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Government Proposals for Government Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Government Proposals for Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centerforsmallgovernment.com/?p=1229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mind boggling describes the findings of a new report from the Government Accounting Office which uncovers massive redundancy in federal agencies and programs.

Fifteen different agencies oversee food-safety laws. More than 20 programs “help” the homeless. Eighty programs are for “economic development.”


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fifteen different federal agencies oversee food-safety laws. More than 20 programs “help” the homeless. <em>Eighty</em> programs are for “economic development.”</p>
<p>These are some of the findings of a new report from the Government Accounting Office which uncovers massive redundancy in the federal government.</p>
<p>Congress needs to tell the legions of Special Interests knocking on their doors for favors everyday that duplicate federal agencies will not be tolerated. Struggling taxpayers, workers and businesses need that money.</p>
<p>“You may have just one lollipop. Not 15. Not 20. Not 80. Just one.”</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">We want one-stop shopping</span>. <strong>No more than one government program or agency per objective.</strong></p>
<p>But this is just the first step. We still need to examine the one agency that remains for redundancy and waste.</p>
<p>We also must determine whether government belongs in this area at all. <strong>99% of all problems are worse served by government</strong> than by the marketplace, charities, churches, social groups, family and friends.</p>
<p>Congressmen and women, especially those who call themselves <em>Tea Party Supporters:</em></p>
<ol style="margin-top: 0in;">
<li>Immediately defund every redundant agency and program. Leave <strong>no more than one</strong> in any area of government.</li>
<li>Reduce and remove redundancy and the money spent for it. Do not &#8220;consolidate&#8221; overstaffing and overspending under one bigger roof.</li>
<li>Cut TOTAL GOVERNMENT SPENDING. Don&#8217;t blow the freed up money on something else.</li>
<li>To be sure the savings move out of government coffers, cut taxes or reduce deficit spending by the same amount. If you eliminate $200 billion in redundant spending, then cut total federal spending or taxes by $200 billion.</li>
</ol>
<p>End the grab for handfuls of lollipops. This is the first step towards fiscal sanity.</p>
<p><em><em><em>###</em></em></em></p>
<p><em><em><em>Carla Howell talks about federal government redundancies on WRKO with host Barry Armstrong: <a href="http://audio.wrko.com/a/37329573/carla-howell-on-wasteful-government-spending.htm">http://audio.wrko.com/a/37329573/carla-howell-on-wasteful-government-spending.htm</a></em></em></em></p>
<p><em><em><em>Wall Street Journal March 1, 2011: <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703749504576172942399165436.html?mod=rss_Politics_And_Policy#articleTabs%3Darticle" target="_blank">Billions in Bloat Uncovered in Beltway</a></em></em></em></p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.centerforsmallgovernment.com/feature/congress-should-tell-special-interests-you-get-just-one-lollipop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

